Whole-Produce Puree
Specify incoming condition, raw handling, removal / waste, specialist pulping / refining and accepted solids / quality. Raw input mass and good puree mass are different quantities.
Define raw preparation versus purchased-base blending, particle / fiber duty, thermal treatment, transfer and packaging before choosing puree equipment.
Discuss Your Project

Specify incoming condition, raw handling, removal / waste, specialist pulping / refining and accepted solids / quality. Raw input mass and good puree mass are different quantities.
Define composition, ingredients, viscosity / fibers, mixing / transfer and required package / storage route. Buying puree can remove major raw-processing duties from the facility boundary.
Fiber, seeds, pieces, acidity and heat / shear sensitivity vary. Trial the actual envelope through mixing, thermal handling, transfer and the final package.
Compare complete alternatives with the same accepted puree quality and package.
Measure the actual product through its temperature / process history and sample after the route.
Establish the product / package preservation and cleaning boundary with responsible specialists.
Review each system by its operating duty and the interfaces to be agreed before procurement.
Agreed puree blending / product-approved holding.
Only where actual product has an agreed batch duty.
Defined vessel / transfer circuits.
Specialist produce preparation / refining / thermal / filling.
Swipe horizontally to compare all columns ↔
| System | Operating duty | Relevant DPS guide | Confirm before purchase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configured tanks / vessels | Agreed puree blending / product-approved holding. | DPS tanks & vessels ↗ | Fiber / solids, viscosity, agitation and cleaning. |
| Configured cookers | Only where actual product has an agreed batch duty. | DPS kettles & cookers ↗ | Thermal, mixing, discharge and qualified process boundary. |
| CIP equipment and circuit interfaces | Defined vessel / transfer circuits. | DPS CIP systems ↗ | Soils, returns and manual tasks. |
| Specialist equipment interfaces | Specialist produce preparation / refining / thermal / filling. | Installation & integration ↗ | Accepted yield / quality and supplier ownership. |
Ask for the accepted product and every excluded preparation / refining / package step in writing. Compare raw-ingredient yield and waste on measured quantities, and review texture after the entire proposed route. A low vessel quote can exclude the largest specialist packages and utility / waste duties.
Swipe horizontally to compare all columns ↔
| Buying question | Evidence to prepare | Engineering decision |
|---|---|---|
| Does the scope start with whole produce? | Incoming material and specialist preparation / waste list. | Compare the same processing boundary. |
| Which product quality is accepted? | Qualified solids, fibers, pieces and preservation / package basis. | Trial representative products. |
| What becomes a saleable stream? | Measured feed / waste / good puree and actual destinations. | Use consistent accepted mass and cash value. |
Start with the business outcome
A puree manufacturer first needs the processing boundary established: receiving whole produce, refining prepared material or blending bought puree are different projects. DPS can assess applicable scoped vessels, utilities, controls, sanitary transfer and installation interfaces around specialist packages. Returns should use accepted puree and actual waste / ingredient balances, not nominal raw-produce throughput or a universal extraction yield.
Confirm the exact fruit & vegetable puree product, preservation route and project suitability with DPS before assigning a delivery scope. Washing / sorting, peeling / pulping / refining, separation, product-specific thermal / aseptic processing and filling require qualified specialists and explicit OEM scope. Product suitability must be confirmed; no DPS proprietary puree technology, validated preservation process or dedicated customer yield is implied.
Define incoming produce or bought puree, raw preparation, pulping or refining responsibilities, waste streams and accepted final solids and quality.
Check fibers, seeds, particles, viscosity and heat or shear sensitivity through the agreed specialist process and package route.
Reconcile incoming material, removed and retained streams, good puree output and the qualified cleaning sequence across representative products.

Review the scope, cost assumptions and operating case for your project. The examples and calculators below support early planning and are not DPS quotations.
Establish actual raw / purchased-ingredient boundary, good-output balance, texture / fiber duty and line losses before selecting a correction.
Define incoming material, product / package, specialist preparation / preservation, waste, utility, site and commercial scope.
Swipe horizontally to compare all columns ↔
| Observed condition | Measure before design | DPS / team decision | Economic basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclear raw-to-good yield | Incoming, waste, retained streams and accepted puree. | Define processing and specialist trial boundary. | Actual input / output cash basis. |
| Transfer / fill limitation | Product-matched viscosity / fiber and line states. | Review passages, routing and qualified hold. | Useful sold good puree after demand. |
| Thermal / cooling delays | Delivered-condition and product-quality records. | Coordinate specialist package and services. | Real baseline energy and feasible useful time. |
| High residual / cleaning cost | Actual purchases, residue, resources and qualified sequence. | Review sanitary route and circuit interfaces. | Independent input / resource saving once. |
Swipe horizontally to compare all columns ↔
| Decision | Targeted Work | Broader Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation Boundary | Improve blending and transfer of qualified purchased puree. | Include raw handling, refining and waste for whole-produce processing. |
| Transfer and Filling | Trial passages and routing against actual fibers and viscosity. | Add specialist process or package capability for a wider product envelope. |
| Accepted Yield | Establish complete raw-to-good material balances. | Compare additional recovery scope using accepted product and waste streams. |
Compare proposals with the same product duty, supplier boundaries and acceptance basis. The amount below is a transparent planning example, not a market price range, supplier estimate or DPS quotation.
| Cost bucket | Assumed amount |
|---|---|
| Product / process and interface engineering | $57,000 |
| Defined configured / OEM component allowance | $200,000 |
| Mechanical / electrical field installation | $109,000 |
| Instrumentation and control integration | $57,000 |
| Commissioning and acceptance support | $33,000 |
| Training, documentation and closeout | $19,000 |
| Defined project scope | $475,000 |
| Separate site / facility additions | $100,000 |
| Capital contingency (15%) | $86,250 |
| Separate one-time startup / shutdown cost | $45,000 |
| Incremental working capital | $35,000 |
| Total initial cash | $741,250 |
The defined scope assumes applicable freight, procurement charges and taxes are included in the owner’s estimate. Add missing civil, land / shell, OEM, environmental, validation and permitting costs explicitly. Site and field conditions, duty, production access and quoted supplier scope determine actual price. Financing is excluded.
Hypothetical owner-budget case: 250 days × 0.5 useful recovered hour/day × 1,200 good kg/h × 55% realization gives 82,500 incremental sold kg/year after the 110,000 kg demand ceiling. Net price $3.8/kg less incremental variable cost $2.4/kg gives $1.4/kg contribution. The baseline inputs assume $18,000 energy, $16,000 water / chemistry and $9,000 maintenance reductions per year. Avoided payroll is 0 hours × $40 × 0% cash realization. Verified baseline purchase reduction contributes $0; its basis is unchanged accepted baseline output. Deduct $22,000 added annual fixed cost. Result: $136,500 steady net benefit; initial cash $741,250 includes the separate site, contingency, startup and working-capital inputs. These are original illustrative assumptions, not a quotation, price benchmark or achieved DPS result.
Calculated from these assumptions: steady annual net benefit $136,500; year-one net cash $73,100; cash payback Beyond 5 years; five-year NPV at 10% is −$281,444. Change the assumptions below to test a different case.
Replace the illustrative inputs with your own measured or quoted values. The five-year pre-tax model uses good kilograms, demand-capped contribution and separately verified baseline savings; it is not a project quotation.
All defaults are illustrative. The default case is an operating-plant improvement, not a greenfield quote. For a new operation, set baseline savings to zero and enter every additional operating and capital cost.
Includes contingency, startup and working capital
Incremental operating cash before tax
Includes year-one ramp assumption
At 10% annual discount
Net annual benefit ÷ initial cash
Net cumulative gain ÷ initial cash
Modeled incremental sales: 82,500 kg/year at $1.40/kg contribution. The base case does not recover the required discounted return within five years. Year-one net cash: $73,100.
Realization needed for the target operating payback
67.6%
Minimum capacity realization for a 5-year operating cash payback; terminal recovery excluded. Demand and unit margin must also hold.
CSV export is local. No inputs are submitted.
Swipe the chart to compare all five years ↔
Swipe horizontally to compare all columns ↔
| Year | Net cash | Cumulative cash | Discounted cash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | −$741,250 | −$741,250 | −$741,250 |
| Year 1 | $73,100 | −$668,150 | $66,455 |
| Year 2 | $136,500 | −$531,650 | $112,810 |
| Year 3 | $136,500 | −$395,150 | $102,554 |
| Year 4 | $136,500 | −$258,650 | $93,231 |
| Year 5 | $136,500 | −$122,150 | $84,756 |
Swipe horizontally to compare all columns ↔
| Case | Annual benefit | NPV | Cash payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| Downside | $90,300 | −$572,028 | Beyond 5 years |
| Base | $136,500 | −$281,444 | Beyond 5 years |
| Upside | $167,107 | −$176,547 | 4.89 years |
Downside: installed and site costs +20%, realization ×0.75 and unit contribution reduced by 20% of its absolute value. Upside: realization ×1.15, capped at 100%, and unit contribution improved by 10% of its absolute value. The demand ceiling still applies.
The default reproduces the main retrofit energy input of $18,000/year before added maintenance. The narrow worksheet is not a product-process calculation and does not automatically transfer values into the ROI model. Additional annual service is included in the main added-fixed-cost allowance; deduct it once.
Prepare the information below, export the assumptions you have modeled, and discuss the unknowns with DPS. An unmeasured input is a question to resolve, not a reason to invent precision.
Checklist and model data stay in this browser until you choose to share them.

Design a ready-meal operation around component cooking, assembly, cooling and distribution, with explicit release gates and equipment interfaces.

Plan a food processing plant layout around product, people, packaging and waste flows, then test space, access, storage and future expansion.

Plan food processing and packaging as one path. Compare rates, batch presentation, buffers, interfaces and staged capacity before selecting equipment.
Bring your product requirements, operating priorities and site constraints to an initial scope discussion with DPS.